tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14345420.post8248267408759444853..comments2023-12-21T12:24:25.009-05:00Comments on Fight in the Dog: 2006 Fall WLV4 RankingsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14345420.post-33538938597881264232006-12-05T19:22:00.000-05:002006-12-05T19:22:00.000-05:00Regarding the first comment:
Yes, I agree with you...Regarding the first comment:<br />Yes, I agree with you! Although Wisconsin did race lightweight fours at the Head of the Iowa, the competition was isolated and couldn't be compared, in either eights or fours, to the rest of the lightweight field. This made the victory impossible to measure. For this same reason Wisconsin was unranked last year in the fall. I thought this was obvious, but perhaps I should have mentioned it. I would be anxious to hear another analysis, however, that addresses where you should be placed in the mix.<br /><br />Regarding the second comment:<br />I can add these rankings to the sidebar and adjust through the season. I didn't do this in the past because the fours are just so difficult to track and rank. I start out the V8 list with preseason rankings, but I can't do that with fours, mostly because it is less clear who will actually be racing fours. Also, the volatility of the fours is greater than the eights so there is more opportunity to look silly (which I don't really need help to do!) trying to do a preseason and early in-season ranking. Fours are important, though, so I'll try it this season by starting out with the fall ranking.JW Burkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00986444574194021099noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14345420.post-13949902280948840422006-12-05T15:23:00.000-05:002006-12-05T15:23:00.000-05:00Can you add these rankings to your side-bar as wel...Can you add these rankings to your side-bar as well so that we can see how the fours change over the season just like we see the eights?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14345420.post-41112096688437076162006-12-05T14:16:00.000-05:002006-12-05T14:16:00.000-05:00Yeah, good analysis. Wisco probably wouldn't be t...Yeah, good analysis. Wisco probably wouldn't be there at all.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com